The idea of perpetual motion is nothing new. It was discovered
and proven by ORFFYREUS in the beginning of the 18 century. He invented
a working system using the gravity force to power his wheel. This made
him famous in history. He described his invention in a book written in
Latin and German. The front page begins with a dedication to God,
to the public, to man of learning, and to himself as discoverer. His
work was certified by scientists of the day. Why don't we have
this great invention to this very day ?To understand one another we communicate
in words or sentences. In words we can express precisely the thought
of the mind. So far everything seems to be correct. Wrong!
We know that over the centuries some words change in meaning. If
we look in the dictionary from 17-18 century some words have a totally
different meaning to the one we know today. It is a big problem
because even a small change in meaning can change the way people
think. Worse still, they are convinced they are right when, in fact,
they are wrong. A few words of explanation in reference to perpetual
motion .
To gain an understanding of anything at all one must depend
on definition What we classify as emotion - pleasure - pain - sound
- colour - intuition are difficult to measure although they can be described
in physical form . My concern is the two words "perpetual" and
"forever". The word " perpetual " convey a different meaning
to different people. Example. To a student of physics it speaks
of a cycle that is repeating it self or action "non stop". An astronomer
immediately thinks of something continuing
" forever ".But how far is "forever"? Thousands of years
or perhaps millions . In resent years the concept of perpetual
motion has passed into oblivion. I would like to explain why this
is so. Most perpetual motion devices were usually designed with
weights falling down or swinging around the force of gravity. Before
Newton no one knew what was holding them to the ground. There was no
definition for such a force. They simply didn't know about it.
The knowledge of sixteenth and seventeenth century classified gravity
force (weights) in the same category as colour, smell, taste. Now
you can see what we are faced with. By the changing of colour or smell
we do not expect the wheel to turn. To this day this is impossible.
After Newton's introduction of his "Principia" our concept of gravity
force changed completely . Weight are no longer classified with taste,
smell or colour. but nobody bothered to change the law in relation to
perpetual motion. So it has remained like this to this very
day. Not many people know that we have three classes of perpetual
motion.
FIRST-CLASS IS THE CREATION OF ENERGY.
SECOND-CLASS IS THE REVERSAL OF ENTROPY.
THIRD -CLASS IS THE ELIMINATION OF FRICTION.
There are pseudo types of perpetual motion but who is going to be
bothered to look into a definition from 17 century and start changing
all of that. The definition for the "perpetual motion" machine
in Newton's time was :
" A machine that works without outside energy input. Later it was
added that it has to do a useful work as well, and it will continue to
do so till it wears out. It was as practical then as the
car is to us today. If something breaks down you change the part and
continue driving . As time passes we observe the definition tend
to undergo changes even to the extent to claim that the machine is an
impossibility, and now we read; (quote, The World Book Encyclopedia )
Perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical device that can continuously
produce work with no energy input, continuously convert energy completely
into work, or continuously produce more energy than it consumes.
No one has ever succeeded in building a perpetual motion machine, and
almost all scientists and engineers believe no one ever will. For
a machine to achieve perpetual motion , it would have to violate one
or both of two laws of thermodynamics. These laws summarise how machines
work.
The first law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed.
Energy may change form - for example, from internal energy to mechanical
motion - but the total of any system remains the same . A system may
be anything from a simple object to a complex machine.
The second law says that heat , by itself, can flow only from a hot
object to a colder object. Inventors have proposed at least two
kinds perpetual motion machines. The first kind would run forever with
no energy input. The second kind would continuously convert energy completely
into work. A machine that would continuously yield more energy than it
consumes is considered by some experts to be a third type of perpetual
motion machine. Other experts class this device with the first kind of
perpetual motion machine. The first kind of perpetual motion machine
violates the first law of thermodynamics. This machine will not work,
because resistance opposes the moving parts of all machines. To keep
running, the machine must use energy to overcome this resistance. Without
energy input, therefore the machine soon stops. The second type
of perpetual motion machine violates the second law. This type of machine
traditionally does work by exploiting the natural flow of heat from a
domly moving molecules in the sea or the atmosphere. But no machine has
been able to do this, either. A machine that would continuously
produce more energy than it consumed also violates the first law of thermodynamics.
this machine would have to create energy. Some people have
considered artificial satellites as possible sources of perpetual
motion. This quotation can go for ever. It comes from The World Book
Encyclopedia.
How about ORFFYREUS's wheel? It was proven and certified by friends
of Sir.Isaac Newton. ORFFYREUS wheel violates all of the laws.
His wheel was working simply on geometrical division in the wheel it
self. Please continue reading my article, the answer is in the
wheel.
DEFINITION 1905
The original Webster International Dictionary 1905
Perpetual Motion (Mech.)
An incessant motion conceived to be attainable by a machine supplying
its own motive force independently of any action from without.
My question is ; Why above definition did not stay forever without
changes?
Not many people are able to understand that present prejudice
in education is one of the main reasons why Perpetual Motion has not
been discovered. By the time someone has the knowledge needed to
invent Perpetual Motion, he is convinced it cannot be done.( quote from
book. Perpetual Motion Inventors R.A.Ford.)
Who changed this definition and why ? What was the reason for
hiding this significant invention ? For further information the
following books can be recommended.
1.Perpetuum mobile (second series 1870 ) by Henry Dircks
2.Strangest of All 1962 by Frank Edwards.
3.Oddities, A Book of Unexplained Facts (1965) by Rupert Gould
4.Physics for Entertainment (1975) by Ya Perelman.
5.Nature Engine ( 1971 ) by Dipankar R.Dutta.
ORFFYREUS very short story can be found in Encyclopedia of Britannica
look under " Perpetual Motion".
Here I'm going to quote a few good examples from book R.A.Ford.
With the passing years, the conviction that Perpetual Motion is impossible
has become so strong that a few scientists are aware that there are three
classes of Perpetual Motion.( quote from book. Perpetual Motion Inventors
R.A.Ford.)
Perpetual motion may not have been invented because of the overspecialisation
of educated men.( quote from book. Perpetual Motion Inventors R.A.Ford.)
Before any invention can be discovered, it must be theoretically possible.
The inventor must have an understanding of how the invention works and
be able to get the needed parts. After this may come years of development
before investors are convinced it is practical and will return a profit.
( quote from book. Perpetual Motion Inventors R.A.Ford.)
The reason college professors feel that Perpetual Motion is an impossibility
is because they have heard of cases in the past where people have worked
on Perpetual Motion , and it has always been a failure. They have come
to feel that it is contrary to their educational knowledge to assume
that Perpetual Motion is a possibility. We should be understanding
towards them for they may not be aware of all the facts.( quote from
book. Perpetual Motion Inventors R.A.Ford.)
Elias Bessler - ORFFYREUS - ( was born 1680 in Zittau - Saxony
) He studied ,theology ,medicine, mechanics and the art of painting
,In his later years he also worked as a watch-maker. When
he was 34 years old he constructed his first wheel which turns without
any outside motive power. This wheel lifts 18 pounds a few feet high.
The wheel also was used to power his grinder in his workshop.
In 1712 in the province of Gera - ORFFYREUS - presented his second
wheel. He also published a book with explanatory notes and illustrated
it with drawings. In my opinion ,history is not giving a true account
of the events, surrounding ORFFYREUS wheels. All the information I have
been able to trace ,points to the fact that the wheel was covered with
canvas, so the insides wasn't seen. It seems a contradiction, on
the one hand, to publish a book with all the explanation,
and then on the other hand try to keep it a secret. In 1713 ORFFYREUS
presented a still bigger wheel with a diameter of 1,5 m and
a thickness of 15 cm. The revolution of this wheel can reach up to 50
turns per minute, and was able to raise 40 pounds off the ground.
It was displayed at Draswitz near Lipsk. In the Encyclopedia Britannia
the definition for perpetual motion goes as follows: it is a machine
which once set in motion will continue that motion non stop without any
outside input of energy ,added to that description such machine have
to do useful work as well, and it was doing exactly that. ORFFYREUS
next wheel was presented in Merseburg and the size was 2 m in diameter
and 30 cm thick. The constructor became very famous and he received
a certificate acknowledging his wheel was the perpetual motion machine,
stating that the sufficient precautions had been taken, to ensure that
the performance of the machine was not due to fraud. It was signed
by a number of scientists some of whom were well known and friends of
sr.Isaac Newton. History shows that from that moment things started
to turn sour for ORFFYREUS. As his invention became more
and more popular the general feeling in the community turned
against him .His certificate proves the existence of perpetual motion,
and this was an insult to influential people. It contravened the
accepted law of nature and physics. The breaching of these
laws landed him in jail (for insulting a monk ). In these circumstances
ORFFYREUS met up with Prince Karl of Saxony who bailed him
out and offered him lodging in his castle. Now ORRFYREUS
is working on his new wheel. He had a workshop, tools and an influential
sponsor. But now new problems appeared Prince Karl was faced with
financial tax problems imposed upon him. His castle became a major
tourist attraction. He informed scientists throughout Europe
about ORRFYREUS project and many people arrived to see the perpetual
motion wheel. Somehow a co-operation was formed between Prince Karl and
ORFFYREUS, together they decided to sell the secret of the wheel.
I personally think that it was from this moment that they started
to cover the center of the self turning wheel. Earlier the wheel was
known to be very simple According to Prince Karl's note it is said:
to be so simple that a carpenter boy could make it. They negotiated
with England for some time and apparently the sum of 20000 pounds
was ask for the secret. For that time it was impossible for anyone to
meet such a demand. ORFFYREUS believed that soon or later fortune
would be his, if he could convince influential rulers, scientists and
bankers, that he had indeed discovered the real secret of perpetual motion.
Between scientists and bankers a dispute developed. Bets were made
involving large sums of money. Most of them still had doubt that
such a machine was in existence. To resolve this dilemma they formed
a committee which included some eminent men such as intellectuals, scientists
with a knowledge of mechanics. Back in the castle in the year 1717
committee decided to seal off the room where the perpetual motion
wheel was situated. Members of the committee specified the exact position
in the room for the wheel. Thus the chance of any outside interference
was eliminated. The door was sealed off with wax, and continually
watched by guards. After 20 days the door was opened, and to everyone's
amazement the wheel was still turning. The wheel was stopped ,everything
checked, and then restarted. Again the door was locked for a few
weeks. When the door was opened the wheel was found to be still
running with the same regularity. There were those who lost lots
of money, but they refused to pay, they maintained that such a machine
do not exist. It goes contrary to the law of physic and nature.
Again ORFFYREUS was accused of foul play. This despite the fact that
he fulfilled all the demands in accordance to the definition on perpetual
motion. ORFFYREUS won the prize but never saw the money.
There is also evidence to the existence of ORFFYREUS wheel in the Russian
chronicles. It is on record that Tsar Peter the Great was willing to
pay 100 000 rubble's for the secret .He had planned a trip to Saxony
but later same year he died . ORRFERUS was left penniless unable
to honour his obligation to his sponsor and Prince Karl in turn could
not pay the tax-man. Some of the scientists, who were
members of the jury tried to look under the canvas to reveal the
secret. This angered ORFFYREUS so much that he went into a rage
and smashed his machine to pieces with an axe. This is the fascination
of the story: there are facts in history that should be faced. There
a pieces of testimonies of extremely knowledgeable witnesses. It is a
dilemma to the world of physics .This perpetual motion machine was certified
by Duke Karl in 1718. Let us presume that ORFFYREUS wheel was a simple
discovery, that is still to be announced, and this would be a challenge
to rethink and re-examine the laws of science. Think about the
benefit to HUMAN CIVILIZATION.
This is a letter to Sir Isaac Newton written by Professor of mathematics
W. J. Gravesande. (Quote Source :"Perpetuum Mobile"
by Dircks) It is a hollow wheel, or you can say drum,
14 inches (35 cm.) thick and 12 feet (3.5 metres) diameter .It is very
light, as it consists of several cross-pieces of wood framed together,
and everything is covered over with canvas, to prevent the inside
from being seen. Through the centre of this wheel or drum runs an axis
of about 6 inches (15 centimetres ) diameter cut at bough ends by iron
axes of about three-quarters of an inch
(2 centimetres) diameter upon which the machine turns. I have examined
these axes, and I'm firmly persuaded that nothing from without the wheel
in the least contributes to its motion. When I turned it but gently,
it always stood still as soon as I took away my hand; but when I gave
it any tolerable degree of velocity , I was always obliged to stop it
again by force ; for when I let it go, it acquired in two or three turns
its maximum velocity , (then) it revolved at 25 or 26 times in a
minute.
This letter is directed to J.T. Desaguliers and written by
Baron Fischer, architect to the Emperor of Austria. I must assure you
that I'm quite persuaded that there exists no reason why this machine
should not have the name of Perpetual Motion given to it; and I have
good reason to believe that it is one, according to the experiments which
I have been allowed to make by permission of His Serene Highness.who
had the patience to be present at the trials which I made during two
hours. It is a wheel which is 12 feet (3 metres ) in diameter,
covered with oil-cloth. At every turn of the wheel can be heard about
eight weights , which fall gently on the side towards which the wheel
turns. This wheel turns with astonishing rapidity , making 26 turns in
a minute when moving freely. Having tied a cord to the axle, to turn
an Archimedean screw for raising water, the wheel then made 20 turns
in a minute. This I noticed several times by my watch and I always found
the same regularity. I then stop the wheel with much difficulty,
holding on to the circumference with both hands . An attempt to stop
it suddenly would rise a man from the ground. Having stopped it in this
manner, it remained stationary; and here - Sir,- is the greatest
proof of it being a Perpetual Motion. I restarted it very gently,
to see if it would of itself regain its former rapidity- which I doubted,
believing, as they said in London, that it only preserved for a long
time the impetus of the impulse first communicated. But to my great astonishment,
I observed that the rapidity of the wheel augmented little by little
until it had made two turns, and then it regained its former speed, until
I observed by my watch that it made the same 26 turns a minute as before,
when acting freely; and 20 turns when it was attached to the screw
to raise water. This experiment,-Sir- showing the speed of the
wheel to augment , from the very slow movement that I gave to it , to
an extraordinary rapid one, convinces me more then if I had only
seen the wheel moving a whole year, which would not have persuaded me
that it was perpetual motion, because it might have diminished little
by little until it ceased altogether; but to gain speed instead of losing
it, and to increase that speed to a certain degree in spite of the resistance
of the air and the friction of the axle, makes me unable to see how anyone
can deny the truth of so describing it. I also turned it in
a contrary way, when the wheel performed as before. I carefully
examined the axles of the wheel, to see if there was any hidden artifice;
but I was unable to see anything more than the two small axles which
the wheel was suspended at its centre.
ORFFYREUS provided description of his invention in published pamphlet....
the translation reads in part
( Quote Source:"Perpetuum Mobile" by Dircks)
" The internal structure of the machine is of a nature according
to the laws of mechanical perpetual motion, so arranged that certain
disposed weights, once in rotation, gain force from their own swinging,
and must continue this movement as long as their structure does not lose
its position and arrangement.." " Unlike all other automata, such
as clocks or springs, or other hanging weights which required winding
up, or whose duration depends on the chain which attaches them, these
weights , on the contrary, are the essential parts, and constitute the
perpetual motion itself; since from them is received the universal
movement which they must exercise so long as they remain out of the
centre of gravity; and when they come to be placed together, and so arranged
one against another that they can never obtain equilibrium, or the punctum
quietus which they unceasingly seek in their wonderfully speedy flight,
one or other of them must apply its weight at right angles to the axis,
which in its turn must also move."
To Part Two
|