ORFFYREUS PARADOX The drawings and function of ORFFYREUS two wheels come from his book. They do not give a clear view. Too many details tend to distort the overall picture. I've studied the drawings for some time and I've made a working model. During the study I selected seven points from ORFFYREUS statements. Then I proceeded to prove the possibility of the continuos motion of his wheels. This are the seven points from his book. 1. weights on one side were further from the axle . 2. continual imbalance give wheel rotation . 3. once in rotation ,gain force from their own swinging. 4. apply its weight at right angles to the axis . 5. weights passed over the zenith position. 6. simple arrangement of levers and weights. 7. eight weights falling at every turn. The wheel has two parts, one rotates, the other is motionless. The latter was designed to collect weights, rise them up, and supply them back to the wheel at a right angle passing through zenith point. It is very difficult to imagine such a wheel. The drawings I have shown two different working system. The wheel displayed in Duke Karl Castle has a diameter divided in to six equal parts. On that drawing there's a scale, which in fact is equilibrium where one side has twenty weights and the other twelve. To keep the balance eight weights are missing. So I discover point NR. 7- -eight weights tapping at every turn. Those eight missing weights are on the frame of the wheel. They are on one side and always on one side ,and because of this they turn the wheel. The second wheel was built in Draschwitz near Lipzig. This wheel has a radius divided into three equal parts and only one part was used. This part was divided into two equal parts ,these two equal parts were divided one into six the other into seven. Now I want to explain the rest points previously mentioned. very important is the first point. "The weights are always on one side and further from the centre." Consider a pushbike standing upside-down, place object on top of wheel, now observe, the wheel will turn, and the object will fall off, but the wheel continues to rotate. For better understanding let's glue an object for example a fifty cent piece ,to top of tyre. Now the wheel starts to rotate with the coin from top to bottom, and surprise, is not stopping will continue turning towards starting point. However, it will stop before reaching this point , it will then swing back and forth with less and less momentum till stops. Now if one weight is giving this movement let's find out what happens if we have two weights. Place one weight at top of the wheel, and the other at the bottom. We now discover that the wheel is not moving at all cause it is in balance. Let's now go back to our first point. m convinced the problem, with the weights always being at one side and further from the centre, is solved by using only one weight placed on top of the wheel and taken off at the bottom. This is the only situation in which the wheel turns by itself. Now if we, somehow, find a method whereby weights are placed on top of the wheel, then travel down with a frame, taken off, and lifted beck again to starting point, then we can keep the wheel in constant rotation. Keep in mind that everything has to be automatic without any outside interference. Let's imagine that the weights we use are golf -balls and the wheel in our project have the ability to catch the ball at the top of the wheel and release it at the bottom. The biggest problem is with the raising of the balls. Contrary to common physics , this cannot be achieved without outside input of energy. But is this so ? Hands up who believe and understand scientists. Through science we know a lot , but in everyday life the average person does not connect motion to simple physics . Example. A playground and children on a seesaw ( equilibrium ).How many of us can associate a see-saw with the push-bike wheel, or draw the circumference around equilibrium ? So far not many. But this is the answer to ORFFYREUS wheel. Imagine two children (same weight) on a see-saw. They are in perfect balance and neither can touch the ground. All we have to do is to place one child closer to axle , and the other child becomes heavier and touch the ground. That is a fact. Now place one child on one arm of equilibrium about three meters long. On the other arm about 30 cm. from centre we place a very heavy person. Is the child's weight able to raise the heavy person up ? OF COURSE .This is simple physics . From this little exercise we learn that any object gains in weight the further it is place from the centre , the opposite applies as we move toward the centre on opposite side of see-saw. The child gains advantage at the rate of about ten times more then the very heavy person. Come back to the wheel. One ball is ale to lift up seven or eight balls , but only to the height of one. That is just enough to place next ball to rotate wheel. The description from ORFFYREUS book look very close to the situation with the see-saw . " Weights are situated further from centre of gravity , weights are in motion , and they are on one side of the wheel. In that arrangement the weights are non stop supplied to the wheel in zenith position ninety degrees angle to the axle. Wheel must turn till someone stops it. ORFFYREUS discovered the paradox of the possibility of lifting up those weights in the centre of the wheel and used the idea in his famous wheel. I call this the power of one , where one unit is always able to lift rest of the units coming from division of radius in the wheel. |
Now I have to remind you that the wheel
has two parts . One motionless the other movable .Balls travel
only a quarter of a circle , if they go to the bottom they have
to climb back higher distance to the top and that was waste on
energy. Number eight come from division of the circumference
in to 8 parts and every point was a nest for a ball to
hold it and to release it at about ninety degrees level then
roll it self on platform 4% slope to the center. It looks
like the same physics with the law of conservation of energy
is able to prove the existence of perpetual motion. Author- Jan Rutkowski assisting in translation Sigmund Bonde Rasmussen Description of rising system |
Ball NR.4 is place in the nest.(dot line)
on the wheel, and whole wheel is working as lever to rise balls
1,2,3.NR.4 is moving with the wheel until 90 "level
from zenith point. The platform has a slope 2-4 % to the center
of the wheel. Ball NR. 4 is taking position where NR.1
was because 1,2,3, are already up. The blocking pin stops
them from falling down. Physical and mathematical proof of the system. Every ball is 1 kg. Ball NR.4 is further from the centre of the wheel about four diameter's of 1 ball = 10cm. Ball 1,2,3, is 3 kg. and is after centre 10cm. There is no balance because one ball is missing. That ball is on the rim of the wheel and is moving. |
We can easy estimate that left side withopposed
to right side where there is only 3 kg. And that is 1
kg. is heavier as becausebalance to be restored right side must
have 4 x 1kg.weights, but 1 kg. is about 4 times further
from the centre .For seeing this never happens we have achieved
the phenomenon known as perpetual motion . (one weight is always on left side ) Thanks to physics we can proof historical genius to Orffyrius and lets hope that is not going to take another 280 years to recognise this. |
|
PROOF
TO PERPETUAL MOTION ARRANGEMENT. NOW 1kg x 5 units from axle = 5 kg
(acting power). |
|