Alternative Science & Technology Research Organisation
DISCLAIMER: All information given in this newsletter is for educational purposes only. No claims are made on or for the validity or correctness of the material provided. ASTRO S.A. Incorporated accepts no responsibility for any mishaps or accidents incurred by any persons utilising this information.
April 2001 Newsletter
Hi Astro Members, I am currently in my final year of industrial design, I am writing to you all in regard to my major project. I visited your meeting last month and found it to be very interesting, it helped me decide on this idea for my project. I intend to design an urban oriented vehicle that can be used simply as a big boys toy or more meaningfully, as a useful means of short distance commuting. I have considered the use of on-board fans that could help charge a battery of an electric motor and also the mounting of a mini jet engine that has 30 pounds of thrust. But these ideas appear to have some flaws. I will continue to explore the many possibilities of propulsion for my scooter type vehicle, and my focus will be on a system that is preferably sustainable to our planet. If any one is interested in offering any ideas, recommendation or comments in regard to an alternative means of propulsion, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, sincerely, Sam Deslandes. sambec@camtech.net.au or Ph: 08 82233723 |
PS This might be of interest to some of you. Attached is a picture of a vehicle that myself and a fellow student designed last year. The sheet aluminium vehicle travelled 70 meters using a I kilo weight. |
Electric Morris 1100:
At the last ASTRO meeting, two new people, Vic and Warwick, came along at the invitation of Andrew. I think everyone was pleasantly surprised by the involvement of these two new people in the meeting with both giving short talks on their respective projects. Vic told us that he has been an inventor for a long time and how at the age of 88 he began the construction of an electric vehicle. The vehicle is now built and running and has been handed over to Warwick to have a play with it and to look at any improvements which may be made.
The vehicle chosen for the conversion was a Morris 1100. The head, pistons and con-rods were removed and a metal plate installed on top of the block to cover the bores,etc. The radiator has also been removed. The 24 volt electric motor is an 8.5HP gun turret drive motor from a battle tank. This was mounted on top of the 1100 motor, or what was left of it, and has a belt drive installed directly on a pulley mounted on the front of the crankshaft.
Power for the motor is provided by four 6 volt Apex deep cycle batteries connected in series to give a total of 24 volts. Originally these were mounted in the boot but Warwick has since moved them to behind the front seats to try and reduce the voltage drop in the cables to the motor. The motor is turned on by a contactor connected to the accelerator pedal. There is also an isolating switch in the cable from the batteries. A separate 12 volt battery is mounted in its original position in the engine bay and supplies all the ancillary equipment like lights, wipers, etc.
Because of the way Vic has done this conversion, the electric motor drives through the original clutch and gearbox so the car can basically be driven like a conventional car. Warwick took me for a short couple of laps around the yard out the front of his workshop. Although no V8, the performance was quite impressive with the vehicle being able to pull away from a slow speed in fourth gear easily. Probably the most disconcerting thing for me was the silence when the vehicle was stationary, something to get used to I guess!
The car has not been tested enough to record how far it will travel between charges etc. but not withstanding this I think this car is an extremely good effort from Vic and is an inspiration for anyone thinking electric vehicles. Also to begin building it when he was 88 (Vic is now 90) shows that it is never too late to do anything! ..Bruce
2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47 53 59 61 67 71 73 79 83 89 97 101 103 107 109 113 127 131 137 139 |
The critical temperature for water
The temperature at which water boils depends on pressure. On high mountains boiling water is too cool to make good tea, while in a pressure cooker set for 15 pounds pressure (double normal air pressure) the boiling point is 250 degrees F (121 degrees C). A liquid expands as it gets hotter and has very little volume change with pressure, while a gas tries at the same time to expand with heat and contract under pressure. The boiling temperature doesn't rise as fast as the pressure, so the density of steam at the boiling point becomes larger as the pressure increases. Eventually the compression of the steam under the increasing pressure is so great that there is no longer any difference between steam and water. This occurs at a temperature of about 374 degrees C or 705 degrees F (called the critical temperature for water) and a pressure of over 200 atmospheres.
Subject: Amazon forest
The Brazilian congress is now voting on a project that will reduce the Amazon forest to 50% of its size.
(YOU MAY HAVE SEEN THAT GREENPEACE IS TODAY BOYCOTTING HARDWOOD FROM THE REGION).
The area to be deforested is 4 times the size of Portugal and
would be mainly used for agriculture and pastures for livestock.
All the wood is to be sold to international markets in the form
of wood chips, by multinational companies.
The truth is that the soil in the Amazon forest is useless
without the forest itself. Its quality is very acidic and the
region is prone to constant floods.
At this time more than160.000 square kilometres deforested with
the same purpose, are abandoned and in the process of becoming
deserts.
149 151 157 163 167 173 179 181 191 193 197 199 211 223 227 229 233 239 241 251 257 263 269 271 277 281 |
A look at Constant Current verses Constant
Voltage power supplies for incandescent lamps.
Continued from last month.
By Ken Kranz.
An extract from the web site at http://kenkranz.8k.com/cclamp.htm
In Diag # 5 the circuit conditions are as follows;
Lamp voltage | 9.16 volts (very low) | Poor brilliance, low lamp efficiency. |
Total lamp current | 2.84 amps | |
Wire loss I2R | 8 Watts | High copper loss (only 26 watts to lamps) |
Supply voltage | 12 volts |
Due to the fact the current in a lamp varies with filament temperature, the above voltages and currents were measured on a actual test set up.
In Diag # 6 the circuit conditions are as follows;
Lamp voltage | 12 volts per lamp | Full brilliance |
Lamp current | 1.66 amps | Full brilliance |
Wire loss I2R | 1.66Watts | Low copper loss ( full 40 watts to lamps ) |
Voltage out of constant current supply | 25.66 volts | 12 volts per lamp and 1.66 volts for wire
loss. ( voltage will vary to maintain 1.66 amps ) |
Voltage into constant current supply. | 12 volts |
The above set up (Diag # 5 & 6) was demonstrated at ASTRO South Australia Nov 2000 meeting.
Now for a look at supply impedance.
Impedance is used for a.c. ( Z ). Resistance is used for d.c. ( R ).
Every form of power supply has some
internal resistance (impedance for a.c.) in diagram # 7
this resistance is represented by R1 The load is represented by R2 If R1= .1 ohm the following table applies. |
R1 | V across R1 | Power into R1 (Heat into battery) |
R2 | V across R2
Volts into load |
Power into R2 (Power into load) |
Current |
V= IR1 | P=I2R1 | V=IR2 | P=I2R2 | I=12/(R1+R2) | ||
.1 ohm | .099 volt | .098 watt | 12 ohms | 11.88 | 11.76 watts | .99 amp |
.1 ohm | .196 volt | .384 watt | 6 ohms | 11.76 | 23 watts | 1.96 amps |
.1 ohm | .387 volt | 1.49 watts | 3 ohms | 11.61 | 44.9 watts | 3.87 amps |
.1 ohm | 6 volts | 360 watts | .1 ohms | 6 volts | 360 watts | 60 amps |
It can be seen when the supply resistance equals the load
resistance equal power is dissipated in the supply and load!
Maximum power transfer occurs when the source impedance equals
the load impedance.
In real life, for the sake of efficiency the load Z is normally
higher than the source Z.
With the 12 volt battery above a 45 watt load (3.87 amps) seems to be a reasonable maximum load as the voltage only drops from 12v to 11.61v. The supply only suffers a 1.49 watt heat load.
It can be seen a low output source resistance/impedance is an advantage for constant voltage power supplies. Imagine if the load impedance equalled the impedance of a power station, (maximum power into load) the power station would waste a lot of power!
How not to make a constant current supply! (For use up to 100 volts out)
If
we wanted a constant current supply we could simply start with a
high voltage supply and simply insert a series resistor to set
the supply impedance ( large zeners could be placed across the
output to limit the voltage).
The circuit to the left will deliver 1 amp into a short circuit
and .91 amp into 100 ohms (load resistor) at 91 volts.
When driving 10 ohms at .99 amp the 1000 ohm resistor dissipates
980 watts and the 10 ohm load we are trying to drive dissipates 9.8
watts ( less then 1% efficient). The current regulation is down
to about 10% at 100 volts output. It can be
seen we are wasting our time with this method of producing a
constant current supply. A higher voltage supply and
higher value series resistor will improve the current regulation
and reduce the efficiency.
How to achieve efficiency over 90%.
Using modern circuit techniques it it is possible to produce a highly efficient constant current supply, the block diagram above (Diagram #9) is one possible solution. Due to the electronic control the output resistance is very high, a 1 ohm load will produce fundamentally the same current as a 100 ohm load. It should be noted at zero output even with automatic standby the efficiency will be < 90%. Standby current however could be very low, (microamps) having no affect on the battery life. High efficiency can be expected for normal loads.
If is Pin a fixed small amount (say 1mW) as Pout appoaches zero, the efficiency will approach Zero!
Peter's Page ASTRO MEETING Friday March the 9th 2001 |
The meeting started at 8.00 pm and was opened with a welcome
to all by Roger. Athol read out the previous month's minutes.
They were moved by Robert N and seconded by Cedric.
Davershoen
(Video Librarian) asked that
members take only a maximum of three videos. He said that the UFO
club had about 350 videos and that their members had to pay a
deposit to withdraw a video, suggesting that we should consider
something along the same line. He also said that Ashley had
replaced five of the six missing videos and asked if anyone had a
copy of the one still missing
" Secrets Of Perpetual
Power" to donate to the library. There was a video supplied
by BrianW.
Michael
(Treasurer) gave his report
$1308.30
currently in funds with an expenditure of $30.00 over the last
month on videos.
Andrew S
made a tentative suggestion that
we might consider giving Michael and his family a break by having
our ASTRO meetings at the Clarence Park Community Centre. It cost
$7.00/hour and Friday nights were available. The general
consensus seemed to indicate that we were happy with the status
quo.
Owen
(A Visitor) said that he was running a
weekly youth group at Nth. Adelaide Community Centre and would
like to establish an ASTRO youth component there. He asked if
anyone from our group was interested in helping him. There were (I
think) three volunteers. He also suggested the possibility of
starting an Edward De Bono Fan Club. Meeting closed at 8.15pm.
Roger
said that as there was no formal
guest speaker it would be a general discussion night. Kieth
started it off by producing an old fashioned fly trap, which was
basically a long narrow trough that you put a bit of honey and
water in and fitted it under your window
then bye, bye Louie.
He also said that his son had got some information off the Webb
regarding the advantages of rotary against conventional engines.
A rotary is half of the weight with 100 components versus the
1100 or so in a conventional engine.
Andrew
introduced Vic, a sprightly 91 year
old guest, who told us his amazing story of having just fitted an
8hp 24v USA battle-tank turret drive-motor into an old Morris
1100, converting it into a successful electric car. He removed
the back seat and fitted the battery bank into its place. Vic had
originally tried to get Warwick, a mechanical engineer ,to
convert the Morris, but when he declined, Vic did it himself (in
two years at 89 years of age). It runs for 2 hours at speeds up
to 45/50 mph and then he charges it up over night. It cost him
about $5000.00 to convert. Vic is also a bit of an inventor,
stating that he has made money out of quite a few inventions and
that he had three more inventions coming up.
Roger
mentioned that Peter Bennett was
running one more final lecture on organic gardening. This will be
a ten lecture series. Phone 8379 7999.
There were short discussions on asteroids hitting the earth,
impending ice ages, motorised scooters, G M foods, MIR bugs,
power station versus motor vehicle efficiencies, and an article
about Tom Bearden from Peter P. Tom's over-unity device is
claimed to have a "Coefficient of Performance" of 5.
Later models are expected to achieve COP's of up to 30.
Roger
wants people to put advertising onto
their cars and earn $200 to $4 00 / month He also suggested that
"Shirley" from SOS
Save our State
would
possibly be an interesting Guest Speaker. She comes from a
company called "Solaris Technology Pty Ltd.", 7/543
Churchill Rd, Kilburn SA 5084. Ph. 08 8359 1900 . They deal in
commercial and industrial solar and wind powered systems.
Warwick
.( a guest and a mechanical
engineer) described an "Indirect Evaporative Cooling System"
that he has been professionally involved with. The concept was
originally developed by the CSIRO in 1976 as a "Plastic
Plate Heat Exchanger". He had spent seven years in
developing a thermo-moulder to commercially produce these units,
commenting that plastic has a mind of its own. These units do not
add moisture to the air and achieve a 20 degree drop in
temperature, which is approximately double the drop of a
conventional evaporative unit. The CSIRO had the University of
South Australia test the figures, with a stated efficiency of 80
- 90%, not adding air.
These units are about 40% larger than conventional evaporative
units, but have appeal to hospitals and nursing homes as they use
100% fresh air, use approximately 1/4 the power of reverse cycle
units and do not have a Legionella problem as the water chamber
temperature is too cold. The company that Warwick works for is
called "FICOM Pty Ltd", 5 Mack St Glenelg, South Aust,
Ph 08 8350 9898 .
Owen
told about a new cheaper form of
patenting, unique to Australia, called Innovative Patenting. It
is quick and cheap to obtain, lasts for 8 years, available over
the Internet and is accepted without examination until challenged.
There was quite a bit of discussion on the pros and cons of such
a system. Robert N mentioned Robert Shelldrakes morphogenic
field, in which more than one person can come up with the same
idea at the same time. Examples were quoted.
Uli
said that one needs a patent to get
financial backers, while Andrew S suggested that it was better to
start production rather than messing around with patenting.
Percy
gave us a run down on his Bio Diesel production saying
that it took 2 hours to produce 10 gallons in his unit, at a cost
of 17 cents per litre.
Rodger
suggested the possibility of getting
Phill Callahan to talk at the Clarence Park Community Centre on
"Para Magnetism" Devashoen explained that Phill was the
"Tower of Power" proponent, stating that everything has
antennae and works electrically.
Rodger
(from M Bridge) spoke on an American
company, Hydro Environmental Resources, that has a 3 gallon
container with a lamp, that acts as a fuel cell to produce
electric / steam power. They are on the Internet at http:// www.heri.com.
A film on this is due to be released in April in 80 cities around
USA. Rodger also told us about two Australian inventors at Cairns
QLD, who had invented a magnetic generator capable of producing
24 Kilo Watts of electric power continuously. This was reported
on the front page of the Cairns Post on the 7th of March 2001. (
editor's note
there is a picture and an article on Http://www.sightings.com)
If this as it is portrayed, it is the most important invention in
the history of mankind.
Andrew S
remarked on a Dennis Lee invention, where his
reverse cycle unit could power a household. This was three years
ago.
Vic
spoke on his concepts of the Joe Cell.
He also reflected on the universe as a hologram and said that in
tornados, odd things such as straw imbedded in glass suggested
that displacements in time had occurred.
The meeting was then closed with Rodger inviting everyone to
supper. The next meeting will be on the 6th of April, due to the
13th being Good Friday.
Until Then
PeterP
Wanted: One VGA computer monitor to replace the faulty ASTRO monitor. |
ASTRO Home
Page http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/astro1/ |
Peter Patterson email peterastro@hotmail.com |
Ken Kranz (Newsletter and Web Page) email ken_kranz@hotmail.com Phone 08 83872845 |
ASTRO Photo
Album http://www.dreamwater.com/astro1/photo.htm |